 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
muzza 90cc 2 stroke / 110 4 stroke
Joined: 06 Jul 2007 Posts: 78
 |
Posted: Fri May 22, 2009 9:22 pm Post subject: Tecate on Ebay |
 |
|
| Noticed there is a Kawasaki Tecate for sale on Ebay. It has a buy now price of $4000, current bid is $800. Look under Tecate in Ebay listing. |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Sponsor  |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ForeverThreeWheels The Day Starts With OZATV !

Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 1742 Location: Maitland  |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
dyates69 50cc nipper
Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 32
 |
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 1:01 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| How do you mean smack in the mouth? You think it's too expensive at $4k? |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ForeverThreeWheels The Day Starts With OZATV !

Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 1742 Location: Maitland  |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
dyates69 50cc nipper
Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 32
 |
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 10:38 am Post subject: |
 |
|
Yeah I'm looking into the air cooler. It looks excellent in that photo, just looking for a current one. I'm assuming it would be kept in the same sort of condition. I just have to get it freighted to Perth.
Other than the lack of HP, are these significantly inferior to the other 85> race trikes? It certainly looks excelllent. |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
dyates69 50cc nipper
Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 32
 |
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 10:48 am Post subject: Tecate |
 |
|
To be fair though I think their wasn't a lot done to the engine on the Tecate during the restore. I think the gear level may have been welded on on the old motor (looks it in the restore photos?) and I assume being an older unrestored motor the kickstarter could have had issues too.
I agree though if you want top dollar, especially in this climate, you need to get it right before selling. I was at the point of picking this up then realised the new kickstarter hasn't arrived and the gear lever's not in place. So it's tough to even get a test run on it. Also I'm concerned if the lever's come off a few times, the gear splines are probably worn out also. It makes me question the entire motor condition which I don't feel is an issue with the Honda. |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ForeverThreeWheels The Day Starts With OZATV !

Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 1742 Location: Maitland  |
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 12:15 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| dyates69 wrote: |
Other than the lack of HP, are these significantly inferior to the other 85> race trikes? It certainly looks excelllent. |
Yeah dude, the earlier "non race" models are a real turd burger but if you rev them really hard they get LOUD! They come in RED too, the same colour as the 85> race models, thats why i bought mine...DH!  _________________
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
dyates69 50cc nipper
Joined: 31 Jan 2008 Posts: 32
 |
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 12:59 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| ForeverThreeWheels wrote: | | dyates69 wrote: |
Other than the lack of HP, are these significantly inferior to the other 85> race trikes? It certainly looks excelllent. |
Yeah dude, the earlier "non race" models are a real turd burger but if you rev them really hard they get LOUD! They come in RED too, the same colour as the 85> race models, thats why i bought mine...DH!  |
It was a genuine question. I never said the 83 was "non race", I was referring to a comparison with other 85 or newer water cooled race trikes, of any brand.
I know there was a significant horsepower difference (which doesn't concern me too much). My question was were they otherwise fairly comparable? |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
ForeverThreeWheels The Day Starts With OZATV !

Joined: 18 Nov 2008 Posts: 1742 Location: Maitland  |
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 5:01 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| dyates69 wrote: | | ForeverThreeWheels wrote: | | dyates69 wrote: |
Other than the lack of HP, are these significantly inferior to the other 85> race trikes? It certainly looks excelllent. |
Yeah dude, the earlier "non race" models are a real turd burger but if you rev them really hard they get LOUD! They come in RED too, the same colour as the 85> race models, thats why i bought mine...DH!  |
It was a genuine question. I never said the 83 was "non race", I was referring to a comparison with other 85 or newer water cooled race trikes, of any brand.
I know there was a significant horsepower difference (which doesn't concern me too much). My question was were they otherwise fairly comparable? |
In all honsty, in my opinion...Yes.
The later water cooled models did have better suspension and a little more horsepower but depending on how the trike will be used, i dont think it matters. The water cooled models had a 6 speed box though that is a lot better than the 5 speed the earlier aircooled models came with. Im happy with my trike, its an 83, it never lets me down and it goes everywhere i point it and ive pointed it everywhere. I even know a guy that swapped his 85 model for an 83 model! _________________
 |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Jamie Moderator

Joined: 27 Aug 2006 Posts: 749 Location: somewhere  |
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 6:04 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Quote: | | I even know a guy that swapped his 85 model for an 83 model! |
that guy is me, it was a stupid mistake that I made but what can I do,I like my aircooler but it aint no waterpumper,the aircoolers are quick for what they are but there nothink compared to the 85/6 250r |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
250Rtony 4fiddy Racer

Joined: 25 Apr 2007 Posts: 200 Location: wherever there is a 250r  |
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 6:27 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
would have to agree with you there Jamie _________________ '86 250R ATC
'07 Pro Shark 90cc RED
'07 Pro shark 90cc BLUE
74 atc 70
84 ytm 200 |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Aussieduner Moderator

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 1458 Location: New South Wales  |
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 6:54 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
Yep thats my Tecate and yes the gear lever was welded on when i got it ( god knows why) and the kick started had a new spring and ball bearing installed but needed replacing.
They are a good looking machine but vibrate pretty bad, i didnt really like it that much, you cant beat Honda quality IMHO.
Oh Tony, what about the hubs ?
T _________________ 1989 TRX 250R
Last edited by Aussieduner on Sat May 23, 2009 10:27 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
stitch250R 4fiddy Racer

Joined: 30 Dec 2006 Posts: 260
 |
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 7:40 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| T, do you remember the freight co that you sent it over to W.A with, and rough cost? |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Aussieduner Moderator

Joined: 05 Sep 2006 Posts: 1458 Location: New South Wales  |
Posted: Sat May 23, 2009 10:47 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| stitch250R wrote: | | T, do you remember the freight co that you sent it over to W.A with, and rough cost? |
It was "First Fleet" at Thornton and was $500. _________________ 1989 TRX 250R |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
stitch250R 4fiddy Racer

Joined: 30 Dec 2006 Posts: 260
 |
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 3:18 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
thanks for the info,
have forgotten the details, was it one or two crates you used? and did you have you turn the wheels in or anything to narrow it? also was it tied down upright (standing on grab bar)? |
|
| |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |